Legal Opinion

Carroll Furniture Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 27, 1950No. Docket No. 13600Published

Petitioner, a corporation engaged in the retail furniture business and regularly making sales on the installment plan, elected to compute its income from installment sales on the accrual basis for excess profits tax purposes, pursuant to section 736 (a), Internal Revenue Code.

Read the full summary

Petitioner, a corporation engaged in the retail furniture business and regularly making sales on the installment plan, elected to compute its income from installment sales on the accrual basis for excess profits tax purposes, pursuant to section 736 (a), Internal Revenue Code. Held: 1. The amount of $ 14,091.34 received by petitioner in 1940 as proceeds from a use and occupancy insurance contract which insured against actual loss sustained of profits in business, is includible in excess profits net income. 2. The gain realized in 1941 and 1943 from collections on accounts receivable of an…

1Opinion of the Court

Carroll Furniture Co., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Carroll Furniture Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 13600

United States Tax Court

15 T.C. 943; 1950 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 11;

December 27, 1950, Promulgated

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Petitioner, a corporation engaged in the retail furniture business and regularly making sales on the installment plan, elected to compute its income from installment sales on the accrual basis for excess profits tax purposes, pursuant to section 736 (a), Internal Revenue Code. Held:

1. The amount of $ 14,091.34 received by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Carroll Furniture Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  3. Leo Kahn Furniture Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API