Legal Opinion

Matter of City of Buffalo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

These were appeals by the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Bailroad Company, the Hew Tork Central and Hudson Biver Bailroad Company, the Buffalo, Hew Tork and Erie Bailroad Company, and the Erie Bailway Company, from an order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Buffalo affirming an order of Special Term appointing commissioners to appraise lands of the appellants proposed to be taken in pursuance, of a resolution of the common council, for the purpose of…

Read the full summary

These were appeals by the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Bailroad Company, the Hew Tork Central and Hudson Biver Bailroad Company, the Buffalo, Hew Tork and Erie Bailroad Company, and the Erie Bailway Company, from an order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Buffalo affirming an order of Special Term appointing commissioners to appraise lands of the appellants proposed to be taken in pursuance, of a resolution of the common council, for the purpose of extending thereon the Main and Hamburgh street canal. The facts as regards the lands of the Lake Shore and Michigan…

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

Section 1, title 8 of the charter of the city of Buffalo (Laws of 1870, chapter 519) declares that the city “ shall have power to take lands for public buildings, for parks, public grounds, squares, streets, alleys, fountains, canals, basins, slips and other public waters, and for any other corporate purpose or object.” The subsequent sections of the title prescribe the proceedings to be taken to acquire the title to lands which the common council shall determine to take, for any of the purposes mentioned in the first section, and for the appointment of commissioners to ascertain the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. In re ThomsonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Winona & St. Peter Railway Co. v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In re CaffreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. In re City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API