Legal Opinion

City of Centralia v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1988No. 87-7212PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The issue here is whether the Nisqually River is navigable within the meaning of the Federal Power Act, thereby conferring Federal Energy Regulatory Commission jurisdiction over the City of Centralia’s Yelm hydroelectric power plant project.

OVERVIEW

The City of Centralia (“City”) appeals from an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) declaring the Nisqually River in Washington State to be a navigable river within the meaning of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S. C. § 791a et seq. Because the Commission has jurisdiction over rivers found to be navigable, it ordered the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. The MontelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City Of Centralia, Washington v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API