State v. Davis
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
— Action under Section 9934, Bevised Statutes 1929, to recover $40.78 alleged to have been illegally withheld by defendant collector as commission for collecting State taxes for 1932. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed.
The question presented must be determined by a construction of the revenue laws of the State. [State ex rel. Hadley v. Adkins, 221 Mo. 112, 119 S. W. 1091.]
Defendant admits that plaintiff correctly stated the facts as follows :
“The issues involved in this proceeding grow out of Section 9935, B. S. of Mo. 1929, which section provides for a classification of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Hadley v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State v. Asotin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Scotland County v. EwingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State ex rel. Hamilton v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State ex rel. Shannon County v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902