Bard-Rock Corp. v. Corutky

*612We find no indication in the record that Special Term abused its discretion in denying as moot plaintiff’s motion to preclude (CPLR 3042 [c], [e]) where the bill of particulars in question had been served during the pendency of the motion. A prior order of the same court (Kelly, J.), dated March 19,1982, which granted defendant’s motion to preclude the plaintiff from adducing certain evidence at trial, is unrelated to the instant motion and did not establish the law of the case with respect to plaintiff’s separate demand for a bill of particulars (see, Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162,…