Legal Opinion

Siegel, King Company v. Penny Baldwin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On the 15th day of September, 1926, R. H. Baldwin, a member of a copartnership doing business as Penny & Baldwin, hereinafter réferred to as the plaintiffs, came from Searcy, where they were engaged in the performance of a paving’ contract, to appellants’ place of business in the city of Little Rock, in quest of secondhand pipe, to be used in running a water-line in connection with a paving project.

Baldwin testified that he saw Mr. Siegel, a member of appellant firm,, which is a copartnership doing business as Siegel, King & Company, hereinafter referred to as the defendants, at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Courtesy Flour Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Keith v. FowlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herrick v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Gramling v. JenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Az v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Ramsay v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. HorneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API