Siegel, King Company v. Penny Baldwin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
On the 15th day of September, 1926, R. H. Baldwin, a member of a copartnership doing business as Penny & Baldwin, hereinafter réferred to as the plaintiffs, came from Searcy, where they were engaged in the performance of a paving’ contract, to appellants’ place of business in the city of Little Rock, in quest of secondhand pipe, to be used in running a water-line in connection with a paving project.
Baldwin testified that he saw Mr. Siegel, a member of appellant firm,, which is a copartnership doing business as Siegel, King & Company, hereinafter referred to as the defendants, at the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Courtesy Flour Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Keith v. FowlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Herrick v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Gramling v. JenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Az v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Ramsay v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. HorneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.