Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Esther Jennie Johnson, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 8th day of May, 1912, denying the plaintiff’s motion for counsel fees.

1Opinion of the Court

Bure, J.:

The nature of this action is set forth in the opinion of this court upon the previous appeal. (Johnson v. Johnson, 150 App. Div. 306.) Inasmuch as the order then reviewed, which denied plaintiff’s application for a counsel fee to enable her to maintain this action, was based upon a supposed want of power, when the order was reversed the- proceedings were remitted to the Special Term of this court to consider the merits. From an order denying plaintiff’s application upon the merits this appeal comes.

To justify a court in requiring a husband to pay to his' wife a sum of money to enable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Osgood v. OsgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Waterman v. WatermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Vincent v. VincentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Low v. LowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Low v. LowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Philipbar v. PhilipbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API