Legal Opinion

State v. Fritz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 27, 1985No. C2353; CA A31161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*411NEWMAN, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for waste of a game mammal, a class A misdemeanor. ORS 498.042(2); ORS 496.992(1). During an investigation, Officer Emerson of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife interrogated defendant twice. Emerson made notes of defendant’s statements to him. Subsequently he prepared a report from his notes for the district attorney.1 Before trial, the district attorney gave defendant’s attorney a copy of Emerson’s report. Until his testimony at trial, Emerson did not disclose the existence of the notes to the district attorney or to defendant. Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. McKeenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chisler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API