State v. Fritz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*411NEWMAN, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for waste of a game mammal, a class A misdemeanor. ORS 498.042(2); ORS 496.992(1). During an investigation, Officer Emerson of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife interrogated defendant twice. Emerson made notes of defendant’s statements to him. Subsequently he prepared a report from his notes for the district attorney.1 Before trial, the district attorney gave defendant’s attorney a copy of Emerson’s report. Until his testimony at trial, Emerson did not disclose the existence of the notes to the district attorney or to defendant. Defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. McKeenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chisler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985