Legal Opinion

AKTAS v. FIG AND LILY GARDEN

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 20, 2022No. 2:20-cv-07409Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : OZCAN AKTAS, : Civil Action No. 20-7409-MCA-AME : Plaintiff, : OPINION and ORDER : v. : : MINT ENTERPRISE LLC d/b/a Fig & Lily : Garden, et al., : : Defendants. : : ESPINOSA, Magistrate Judge This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment and for monetary sanctions against the defendants and their counsel, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f) and 37(b) [ECF 59]. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and decides the motion without oral argument. See…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Wachtel v. Health Net, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  5. Sam Hargrove v. Sleepys LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API