Legal Opinion

Woodrich v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent’s determination that petitioner, an inmate at Attica Correctional Facility, possessed a cannabinoid substance in violation of inmate rule 113.12 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [iii]) is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135). There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that respondent violated 7 NYCRR 1020.4 (e) (1) (i), which requires that each person handling a urine sample make an appropriate notation on the chain of custody portion of the urinalysis test…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Nelson v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Hop Wah v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Branch v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API