Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker Co. v. Hawkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1918No. 14654PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered October 13, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Knickerbocker Company, seeks recovery upon a promissory note and the foreclosure of a mortgage securing payment thereof, both of which were executed by the defendants, Elsie C. Hawkins and husband. Trial in the superior court resulted in judgment and decree of foreclosure against both defendants, from which she alone has appealed to this court. She defended in the superior court upon the theory that the note was given in payment of the separate debt of her husband, and that the property conveyed by the mortgage was then, and still remains, her separate property, and that,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. ScranageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Board of Trade v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Katz v. JuddWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. J. R. Watkins Co. v. BrundWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Russell v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API