Legal Opinion
Anderson v. William J. Davis, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 6, 1989No. 87-755PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge.
Appellee William J. Davis, Inc. (“Davis”), filed this action against appellants Anderson and Perticone for possession of an apartment in a building owned by Davis. The principal issue in the case was whether appellants were “tenants” entitled to thirty days’ notice under relevant statutory provisions before being required to vacate the premises. On the undisputed facts, the court ruled that the relationship between the parties was that of employer and employees, not that of landlord and tenants. The court therefore granted Davis’ motion for summary judgment and entered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Robert Robbins v. Ronald Reagan Robert Robbins v. Ronald ReaganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Habib v. ThurstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- District of Columbia v. Catholic University of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Young v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Tenants of 738 Longfellow Street, N.W. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Columbia Realty Venture v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ricardo Hernandez v. Bryant BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Harkins v. Win Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.