Legal Opinion

Checkley & Co. v. Citizens National Bank

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1969No. 41881PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ward

The question presented is whether under the facts of this appeal the rule of caveat emptor may be invoked against a purchaser of lands at a judicial sale.

A judicial sale of land, hereafter described as Tract F, was ordered following the institution of a partition proceeding in the circuit court of Douglas County. The announcement of the sale described the land by metes and bounds and referred to Tract F as “80 acres more or less.” The land was offered for sale and bid off on the basis of 80 acres on a per acre unit basis. The highest bid, $800 per acre, was made by the appellee Checkley and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tilley v. BridgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Gibbs v. DaviesIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bassett v. LockardIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Swanson v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. McManus v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Steinbrecher v. SteinbrecherIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Marino v. United Bank of Illinois, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Bankers Trust Co. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Susman v. Cypress VentureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. American Sleek Craft, Inc. v. NescherDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API