Morgan v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., Presiding Judge.
Kim David Morgan (“Morgan”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 1 motion asserting his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that entrapment was a viable defense. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural History
On July 8, 2008, a jury convicted Morgan of one count of the class B felony of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute in violation of section 195.211. This Court affirmed Morgan’s conviction in State v. Morgan, 289 S.W.3d 802 (Mo.App. S.D.2009), which sets forth a complete statement of facts.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Hurst v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.