Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Layaou

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1979No. 1463PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a judge sitting without a jury and was convicted of theft by deception. Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to two years probation and ordered to pay restitution and costs. The issue on this appeal is whether evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as the verdict winner, see Commonwealth v. Burton, 450 Pa. 532, 301 A.2d 599 (1973), the evidence was as follows: On May 5,1975, Dorothy and Leo Wincek entered into a written contract with appellant, trading as Overbrook…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. GalloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. StewardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. GalloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. BruceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. State v. Atwood.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Com. v. Petrick, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Pratt, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API