Legal Opinion

Howard v. Fall River Iron Works Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 19, 1909PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

This action was brought originally by the plaintiff’s intestate to recover for personal injuries sustained by him while in the employ of the defendant. His declaration was in two counts, the first of which was under E. L. c. 106, § 71, cl. 1, for a defect in the ways, works and machinery of the defendant. Upon his death after bringing the action, the present plaintiff, the administratrix of his estate, came in to prosecute the action. She was allowed to file additional counts, one of which (the third) was at common law, for the alleged negligence of the defendant in setting the deceased to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Standard Oil Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Dixon v. New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Brick v. BosworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Goldthwait v. Haverhill & Groveland Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Bartley v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Devine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. O'Brien v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Beauvais v. Springfield Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. López v. American Railroad Co. of Porto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API