Legal Opinion

Laidley v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 136PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Me. Justice Walling,

This controversy is over the title to a vein of coal. William Armstrong, the common source of title, was the owner of a large tract of land lying along the Monongahela River in Cumberland Township, Greene County, and, in 1847, conveyed seventy-six acres thereof to John L. Dawson; the deed therefor contains the following clause: “together with the privilege of mining under the adjoining land of the said party of the first part [now occupied by Alfred Armstrong] and taking therefrom the vein of or bed of stone coal therein situate within *392the following described…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. McMillin v. TitusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Caldwell v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  3. Commonwealth v. AlburgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  4. Kingsley v. Hillside Coal & I. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1892
  5. Morris v. Lessee of Josiah Harmer's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1833

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Logan v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Hostetter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API