Legal Opinion

Schick v. Ulland

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1922Published

1Opinion of the CourtMarx, J.

By agreement of the parties, this ease was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury. The facts are not in dispute.

The defendant conveyed a house and lot to the plaintiff by warranty deed, containing a covenant that the title was clear, free and unincumbered. At the time the deed was delivered, the property was subject to the lien of a street assessment duly levied by the City of Cincinnati and payable in ten (10) annual installments. Thereafter the plaintiff sold th& property and the plaintiff’s grantee assumed the payment of the street assessments as part of the purchase price.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGuckin v. . MilbankNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Sharp v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Cockrum v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Merritt v. GouleyNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  5. General Underwriting Co. v. StilwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API