Matthew Blake Courtney v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
KING, PRESIDING JUSTICE, DISSENTING:
¶38. Because the petition filed in the youth court was the equivalent of a formal indictment, served to notify Courtney that he was under the jurisdiction of the youth court, and accused him of crimes, I would find that his constitutional right to a speedy trial attached at the filing of the youth court petition. Accordingly, I dissent.
¶39. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial ...." U.S. Const. amend. VI. At the time the alleged…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.