Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matthew Blake Courtney v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2019No. 2017-KA-01267-SCTPublished

1Dissent

KING, PRESIDING JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

¶38. Because the petition filed in the youth court was the equivalent of a formal indictment, served to notify Courtney that he was under the jurisdiction of the youth court, and accused him of crimes, I would find that his constitutional right to a speedy trial attached at the filing of the youth court petition. Accordingly, I dissent.

¶39. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial ...." U.S. Const. amend. VI. At the time the alleged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API