Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barnes v. . Ontario Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1859Published

1Concurrence

ALLEN, J., also delivered an opinion for affirmance, differing from the preceding in no material respect except that upon the question of the validity of the certificate, notwithstanding its execution by the cashier only, the learned judge expressed himself as follows: The first objection taken in this case is, that the plaintiff recovered upon the certificate as a contract, and that it is not a contract obligatory on the defendant.

It is conceded that the defendant is a corporation created by virtue of the general banking law of 1838 (ch. 260, § 7), and the defendant contends that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  4. Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  5. Head & Amory v. Providence Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1804

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API