Legal Opinion

State v. Sanderlin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 24, 2016No. 13CR1122; A156703PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. On appeal, he contends that the mandatory 300-month prison term imposed by the trial court is unconstitutionally disproportionate under Article I, section 16, of the Oregon Constitution and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Before the trial court, defendant filed a sentencing memorandum in which, among other things, he asserted, citing State v. Rodriguez/Buck, 347 Or 46, 217 P3d 659 (2009), that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RyanOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. FudgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API