Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Belmont v. Mittry Bros. Const. Co.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided June 20, 1933No. 1690, 1722PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

These eases were consolidated for trial as they were brought by the United States for the benefit of persons who furnished labor and materials against Mittry Bros. Construction Company and the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland in case No. 1690, and against Wiliam Harkins, Mittry Bros. Construction Company, and the Fidelity & Deposit Company in ease No. 1722. They were tried and argued together, and may well be disposed of by the same opinion.

In case No. 1690 about October 1, 1929, Mittry Bros. Construction Company entered into a contract with the United States for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Mankin v. United States Ex Rel. Ludowici-Celadon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. United States Ex Rel. E. J. Bartells Co. v. Hoffman Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1958
  3. United States Ex Rel. Noland Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  4. Southern Painting Company Of Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Colonial Oil Co. v. United States Guarantee Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API