Legal Opinion

Cagle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1944No. 22490Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant and the State have each filed motions for rehearing. Appellant’s motion is predicated on the renewed contention that the provisions of Title 6, Arts. 304, 305, 312, 316, C. C. P., and Art. 633 P. C., when considered together do not authorize a search warrant to search for implements used in operating a policy game. This question being one upon which the case largely hinged it had the most earnest attention and consideration of the court upon original submission. The conclusions expressed upon the point in the original opinion reflect…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Autry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Faulkner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Scogin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Ayres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Jowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API