Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. Isenman

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 22, 1953No. Civ. No. 53-698-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCARTHY, District Judge.

This is an action to recover a broker’s commission. The defendants served notices that the depositions of the plaintiffs would be taken on August 3, 1953, in Boston, and that the deposition of onp Bandler would be taken on August 4, .1953 in New York City. A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Newr York was served upon Bandler.

*89Counsel for the plaintiffs moved this court for an order extending the time for the taking of the depositions stating that associate counsel was unavailable. At the hearing on this motion, on…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lincoln Laboratories, Inc. v. Savage Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  2. First National Bank at Thermopolis, a National Banking Association v. Western Casualty and Surety Company, a Kansas Corporation, and Third-Party v. Paul W. Axtell, John S. Herrin, Max E. Mortimore, Clem John, Norman Sanford, and Willard Wilson, Third-Party Earl A. Davis, National Bank ExaminerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. First National Bank v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API