Wright v. New Jersey
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
469 U.S. 1146
105 S.Ct. 890
83 L.Ed.2d 906
Charles WRIGHT
v.
NEW JERSEY
No. 84-5060
Supreme Court of the United States
January 14, 1985
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
2DissentJustice Brennan, joined by Justice Marshall
1
The appellant Charles Wright was convicted of possessing an "exacto" knife. Under New Jersey law, possession of this sort of object is entirely legal in most circumstances; possession becomes unlawful only "under circumstances not manifestly appropriate for such lawful uses as it may have." N.J.Stat.Ann. § 2C:39-5d (West 1982) (emphasis added).1 As construed by the state courts, although this statute…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.