Livingston v. Standard Int’!. Mgt., LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion
Fo ~ In light of Defendant's response, the Court concludes that there is no X basis for Court int ti t this ti let al fe ti Rothschild asis for Court intervention at this time, let alone for sanctions. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions - to compel and for sanctions - are 101 Park Avenue, 17th Floor DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF Nos. New York, NY 10178 32 and 33. & 212.878.7900 212.692.0940 www.foxrothschild.com SO ORDERED. Stephanie M. Steinberg, Esq. G Li Ser— Direct Dial: 212-878-7973 Email: smsteinberg@foxrothschild.com November 7, 2025 November 6, 2025 VIA ECF…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Park West Radiology v. Carecore National LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008