Seacoast Construction Corp. v. Lockport Urban Renewal Agency
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Doerr, J.
Petitioner, the low bidder for the construction of a retaining wall at Lockview Plaza, designated Lockport Urban Renewal Project NYR-86, seeks relief pursuant to this article 78 proceeding from the awarding of the contract therefor by respondent Lockport Urban Renewal Agency (hereinafter designated as “ Agency ”) to respondent Scrufari Construction Company, Inc. (hereinafter designated as “ Scrufari”).
Petitioner, Scrufari, and others submitted timely bids in the form and manner required by the Agency fully complying with each and every requirement and specification.
At a regular meeting of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kaelber v. SahmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Kaelber v. SahmNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Haskell-Gilroy, Inc. v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- People ex rel. Gaffey v. FobesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Ward La France Truck Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armere Holding Corp. v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Lacorte Electrical Construction & Maintenance, Inc. v. County of RensselaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991