Legal Opinion

Seacoast Construction Corp. v. Lockport Urban Renewal Agency

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Doerr, J.

Petitioner, the low bidder for the construction of a retaining wall at Lockview Plaza, designated Lockport Urban Renewal Project NYR-86, seeks relief pursuant to this article 78 proceeding from the awarding of the contract therefor by respondent Lockport Urban Renewal Agency (hereinafter designated as “ Agency ”) to respondent Scrufari Construction Company, Inc. (hereinafter designated as “ Scrufari”).

Petitioner, Scrufari, and others submitted timely bids in the form and manner required by the Agency fully complying with each and every requirement and specification.

At a regular meeting of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kaelber v. SahmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Kaelber v. SahmNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Haskell-Gilroy, Inc. v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People ex rel. Gaffey v. FobesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Ward La France Truck Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armere Holding Corp. v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Lacorte Electrical Construction & Maintenance, Inc. v. County of RensselaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API