Legal Opinion

LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 14, 2025No. 3:22-cv-05815Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CONDALISA LEGRAND, Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Re: Dkt. No. 131 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Condalisa LeGrand brings this putative class action against Abbott Laboratories, alleging 15 certain statements on the labels of Abbott’s Ensure® nutrition drinks are false and misleading. 16 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) adds the “Ensure Plus” line of nutrition shakes to 17 Plaintiff’s list of challenged…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API