LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CONDALISA LEGRAND, Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Re: Dkt. No. 131 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Condalisa LeGrand brings this putative class action against Abbott Laboratories, alleging 15 certain statements on the labels of Abbott’s Ensure® nutrition drinks are false and misleading. 16 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) adds the “Ensure Plus” line of nutrition shakes to 17 Plaintiff’s list of challenged…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.