Legal Opinion

In re Holdforth

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bennett, J.

Holdforth was arrested in a civil action at the suit of one Cumlorey. upon an order founded on an affidavit, of which the following is a copy :—

*439“ TtJCKXER CtJMLOBET VS. Chaeles Gf. IIoldfoeth.

“ City and Comity of San Francisco, ss ; Robert S. "Watson “ being sworn, says, that he is the agent and attorney in fact of “ the above named plaintiff—That the above named defendant1, “ in the month of April, 1850, sailed from the port of Hong “ Kong, in the empire of China, in the ship Kelso, bound for “ the port of San Francisco, having in his charge as the agent “ and factor…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Ex parte PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. State v. CochraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ex Parte SmallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API