Legal Opinion

Wibert v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1855PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] It is not material to determine whether it is established by the admissions in the pleadings or the finding of the referee, that the two railroad companies, which together formed the line of transportation between Buffalo and New-York, were partners. It is somewhat uncertain whether the plaintiffs should be understood to aver in the complaint that both companies were common carriers for the whole distance, or only that they ran in connection as a continuous…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parsons v. HardyNew York Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Condict v. Grand Trunk Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Florida Fine Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Geismer v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. WhitehillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API