State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Morrow County Prosecutor's Office
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} In January 2005, relator, the Dispatch Printing Company (“Dispatch”), requested that respondent Morrow County Prosecuting Attorney Charles S. Howland provide it with a copy of the 911 tape relating to the homicides of Diana Cooper and Cameron Bateman. Howland permitted the Dispatch to listen to the 911 tape and offered to transcribe it, but refused to provide the Dispatch with a copy of the tape or allow the Dispatch to record it.
{¶ 2} On January 28, 2005, the Dispatch filed this action under the Ohio Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, to compel respondents, Howland, the Morrow County…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Lee v. KarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Witt v. Ohio Insurance Guaranty Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Highlander v. RudduckOhio Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Smith v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. SageOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ludlow v. Ohio Dept. of HealthOhio Court of Claims · 2021
- Miller v. Ohio Dept. of Health, Vital StatisticsOhio Court of Claims · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.