Legal Opinion
Jason Ray Reynolds Matthew Rausch v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Ajene Edo v. Geico Casualty Company, and Geico General Insurance Company Geico Indemnity Company Government Employees Insurance Company, Subsidiaries of Geico Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 24, 2005No. 04-35279Published
1Opinion of the Court
426 F.3d 1020
Jason Ray REYNOLDS; Matthew Rausch, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.; Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Ajene Edo, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Geico Casualty Company, Defendant, and
Geico General Insurance Company; Geico Indemnity Company; Government Employees Insurance Company, Subsidiaries of Geico corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-35695.
No. 04-35279.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 8, 2005.
Filed October 03, 2005.
Amended October 24, 2005.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.