Legal Opinion

Paul v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 10, 2016No. 4D16-251PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Legrand Jean Paul appeals an order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion. We reverse and remand as to his first ground, and otherwise affirm.

Paul was convicted following a jury trial of two counts of sexual activity with a child, nine counts of showing obscene material to a minor, and two counts of promoting sexual performance by a child. The trial court sentenced Paul to consecutive thirteen year terms on counts one and two, and concurrent ten and five year terms on the other counts. The trial court subsequently mitigated count two to a seven year term.

In ground one, Paul claimed that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Alcorn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Dieugrand Jacques v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Dominique Brice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anthony M. Wait v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Anthony M. Wait v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. GARY RICHARD MCGRIFF v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API