Legal Opinion

Paterson v. Wisener

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1928No. 1 Div. 484PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

This action is under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Laws 1919, p. 206), and the appeal is by the defendant employer from a judgment awarding compensation to the injured workman.

The plaintiff had been totally blind in his left eye since childhood, and while working for the defendant suffered an accident causing the practically total loss of sight in the remaining eye, and resulting in permanent total incapacity.

The trial court held that the case is governed by the Code § 7551 (e) 1%, which declares:

“If an employee has previously lost the sight of one eye or lost one leg or lost one arm, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. People ex rel. Akin v. KipleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Davis & Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. CahelaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Dixie Coaches, Inc. v. RamsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Stith Coal Co. v. AlvisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Brown v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Brown v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API