Legal Opinion

State Accident Fund v. Catsman Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1965No. Calendar 3, Docket No 50,571PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The question is, as defendant says, whether “circumstances surrounding the presentment of a copy of the summons and complaint” to the sheriff’s office by plaintiff’s counsel, “as disclosed by the affidavits,” were sufficient to toll the 3-year statute of limitations.

The cause of action arose out of an accident occurring June 6, 1960, in Midland county. On June 6, 1963, plaintiff’s counsel filed a complaint in the Midland circuit and summons was issued. Defendant’s address was alleged to be in Midland. On the same date of filing, plaintiff’s counsel took a copy of the complaint and summons to…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. William E. Bufalino v. The Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  2. Feliciano v. Autoridad de Acueductos y AlcantarilladosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1966
  3. Bratton v. Trojan Boat Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Bush v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API