State Accident Fund v. Catsman Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The question is, as defendant says, whether “circumstances surrounding the presentment of a copy of the summons and complaint” to the sheriff’s office by plaintiff’s counsel, “as disclosed by the affidavits,” were sufficient to toll the 3-year statute of limitations.
The cause of action arose out of an accident occurring June 6, 1960, in Midland county. On June 6, 1963, plaintiff’s counsel filed a complaint in the Midland circuit and summons was issued. Defendant’s address was alleged to be in Midland. On the same date of filing, plaintiff’s counsel took a copy of the complaint and summons to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- William E. Bufalino v. The Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Feliciano v. Autoridad de Acueductos y AlcantarilladosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1966
- Bratton v. Trojan Boat Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Bush v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.