Legal Opinion

Sheldon v. Keokuk Northern Line Packet Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin

Decided July 1, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Hablan, Justice.

The defendants demur upon'these grounds:

First, that the hill is multifarious, in that it seeks to enforce independent judgments in which the complainants have, no joint interest, and also because it unites with the cause of action against the Keokuk Northern Line Packet Company, in which the defendant Davidson has no interest, a cause of action against Davidson in which his co-defendant has no interest; second, that if complainants ever had any cause of action against the defendants, or either of them, the delay which occurred without suit was so unreasonable as to deprive…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Gaines Et Ux. v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  4. Lawrence v. Trustees of Leake & Watts Orphan HouseNew York Supreme Court · 1845
  5. Howell v. HowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dennison Mfg. Co. v. Thomas Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1899
  2. Williams v. CrabbCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  3. Fish v. KennamerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  4. Cutter v. Iowa Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1899
  5. Halsey v. GoddardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API