Legal Opinion · Dissent

David J. Harms v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 8, 2006No. 03-2038Published

1DissentKasold, Judge

For the reasons stated below, I believe the decision of the Board denying Mr. Harms’ request to vacate an underlying Board decision is a final decision from which Mr. Harms filed a timely notice of appeal with the Court, properly invoking our exclusive and plenary jurisdiction over such decisions. See 38 U.S.C. § 7252; Russell v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 310, 315 (1992) (en banc) (Court’s jurisdiction is plenary); Godfrey v. Derwinski 2 Vet.App. 352, 356 (1992) (“This Court has ‘exclusive jurisdiction to review decisions of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ .... ” (quoting 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a)));…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  4. Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  5. William A. Smith, Claimant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API