Legal Opinion

Korsnas Sagverks Aktiebolag v. Unterweser Reederei Aktiengesellschaft

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 22, 1941Published

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

These are six libels which were tried together. The cargo owners are suing for damages for (1) the cargo which became wet as a result of stranding, and which was sold at Sundsvall, Sweden; (2) the cargo which was found damaged by fuel oil and sold at Kiel, Germany; and (3) the cargo which was damaged in respect to the covers of the bales, as a result of discharge and reloading at various ports. The shipowners have alleged causes of action for general average against the cargo owners, and against the guarantors of the general average.

The SS Heddernheim, of 4,946 tons,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. International Navigation Co. v. Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Work v. LeathersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. The WildcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API