Legal Opinion

Recht v. Glickstein

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1904No. 20,225PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Lake Superior Court; II. B. Tuthill, Judge. Action by Charles Glickstein against Solomon Recht. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellee successfully prosecuted this action in the lower court for damages arising out of the unlawful ■conversion of certain goods and chattels. The only matter in controversy between the parties in this appeal relates to the sufficiency of the amended complaint on demurrer for want of facts. Omitting the formal parts, the pleading in question is.as follows: “The plaintiff complains of the defendant, and says that on or before the 5th day of March, 1902, the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of, as of his own right and property, a certain lot of goods, wares, and merchandise, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. HurleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hampton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Wilkins v. De PauwIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bimel v. BoydIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API