Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sallinger v. Perry.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1903Published

ActioN by K. Sallinger and others against J. W. Perry & Company, beard by Judge Frederick Moore and a jury, at April Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Beetie County.

Read the full summary

ActioN by K. Sallinger and others against J. W. Perry & Company, beard by Judge Frederick Moore and a jury, at April Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Beetie County. In April, 1893, Mrs. Bettie Sallinger, who was the wife of ■the plaintiff, K. Sallinger, was engaged in mercantile business in Bertie County, under the name and style of B. Sallin-ger & Co. At that time she was indebted to the defendant, J. W. Perry, who was then trading under the firm name of J. W. Perry & Co., in tire city of Norfolk, in the sum of $1,000, and for the payment of which indebtedness she, with her husband, the…

1ConcurrenceDouglas-, J.

I concur in the concurring opinion of Justice Walker, for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion, when the case was here before, in 130 N. C., 134, 139.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sallenger v. Perry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API