Legal Opinion

City of Girard v. Oakman

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Trumbull County

Decided March 30, 2018No. 2017–T–0065PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 34} The crime of obstructing official business is defined in R.C. 2921.31(A) :

{¶ 35} "No person, without privilege to do so and with purpose to prevent, obstruct, or delay the performance by a public official of any authorized act within the public official's official capacity, shall do any act that hampers or impedes a public official in the performance of the public official's lawful duties."

{¶ 36} " R.C. 2921.31 has five essential elements: (1) an act by the defendant; (2) done with the purpose to prevent, obstruct, or delay a public official; (3) that actually hampers or impedes a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. PlatfootOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EasterlingOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Girard v. OakmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API