Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Love v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, D. Montana

Decided November 17, 1986No. CV-85-146-GFPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HATFIELD, District Judge.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

At the times pertinent to this action, Clinton and Rose Mary Love operated a farm near Harlem, Montana. The Loves obtained water for irrigation purposes from the Harlem Irrigation District. As of May 25, 1983, the Loves were two years’ delinquent in the payment of their annual water assessments. As of that date, the Harlem Irrigation District terminated delivery of water to the Loves’ farming property. Consequently, the Loves were without water for irrigation throughout the 1983 growing season.

The Loves bring this action against…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Art metal-u.s.a., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snowbird Const. Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1987
  2. Love v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API