Rogers v. State

hEZELL, J.

This appeal arises out of an auto accident. The plaintiff, Calem Rogers, was severely injured when the car in which she was riding struck another car at the intersection of Horseshoe Drive and Masonic *851Drive in Alexandria.1 At trial, the jury found that the intersection created an unreasonable risk of harm, but that the defendant, the (DOTD), did not have actual or constructive knowledge of the unreasonably dangerous condition. The trial judge granted a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) to Calem, ruling that the DOTD had knowledge of the condition. The DOTD appeals the…