Legal Opinion

The Annette Rolph

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 11, 1929No. 19537PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERRIGAN, District Judge.

The interlocutory decree heretofore entered, ordering the sale of the Annette Rolph, provides for a reference to a commissioner “to ascertain and compute the amount due the libel-ant and any intervening libelants in the premises, with leave to said libelant and any intervening libelants to contest the amount due to libelant and any intervening libelants, and to submit proofs therein, and also to contest the priority of the respective claims.” A motion, has now been made to amend the interlocutory decree by striking out the words “and also to contest the priority of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The William LeishearDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
  2. The PhilomenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912
  3. In re New England Transp. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Odysseus IIIDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1948
  2. Norton v. the Evan NDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API