Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cox v. Herrington

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1982No. 80-656Published

1Dissent

I fear the majority moves perilously close today to the rule that a jury's findings on factual matters can never be disturbed.

It is well-settled that "[t]he jury is not the sole judge of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict."Farmers and Ginners Cotton Oil Co. v. Reliance Insurance Co.,341 So.2d 147 (Ala. 1976). "[T]he power to review their conclusions in civil cases is vested in the trial court in the first instance, and in the Supreme Court on appeal."Massengale-Manaster Poultry Company v. Burnett, 284 Ala. 465,225 So.2d 869 (1969).

A new trial should be granted where, after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perdue v. GatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Farmers & Ginners Cotton Oil v. Reliance Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Birmingham Southern Railroad Company v. BallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Shepherd v. Gardner Wholesale, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Howell v. RouecheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API