State ex rel. Belden v. Markey
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the Fifth District Court for the parish of Orleans. Beaumont, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLudelikh, C. J.
The relators have moved to dismiss the appeal taken by the city of New Orleans, oil the following, among other grounds, to wit:
That the city is without interest, either pecuniary or otherwise, in the suit.
The law grants the right of appeal to any.one> though not a party io the suit, if he have an interest in the subject matter of the suit. C. P. 571.
But he must allege and show that interest; and it must he a direct, pecuniary interest. 1 N. .S. 308 ; 4 N. S. 342 ; 4 N. S. 622 ; 2 Rob. 391.
The matter at issue is the right to office — whether the relators or *744the defendants are, under tlie law,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. M'CloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
- Succession of HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
3Cited by5 opinions
- Levert v. Shirley Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- State ex rel. Rogers v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- State ex rel. North v. ErmonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Taylor v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Weise v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902