Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Hapl

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided November 2, 2020No. 2:19-cv-14763Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LEILA DICKERSON, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff VERSUS NO. 19-14763 GLENN HAPL, ET AL., SECTION: “E” (3) Defendants ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Northland Insurance Company’s (”Northland”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in its favor on Plaintiff’s claims for punitive damages.1 Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, the Court considers Northland’s statement of uncontested facts to be admitted pursuant to Local Rule 56.2.2 Although the dispositive motion is unopposed, summary judgment is not automatic, and the Court must…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Meredith v. Louisiana Federation of TeachersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. McDaniel v. DeJeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Taylor v. LumarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API