Legal Opinion

Luglan v. Tomlin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1956No. 12923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of W. T. Tomlin against O. L. Lug-lan in the sum of $2,245.25, together with interest, from which judgment O. L. Luglan has prosecuted this appeal. The above amount is the sum found to be due Tomlin on his contract to build a home for Luglan.

Appellant first contends that he was entitled to an instructed verdict because Tomlin’s claim against him was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, Section 4 of art. 5526, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats. The suit against Luglan was instituted more than two years after the claim arose,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Maddox Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Groce v. P. B. Yates Mach. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Cannaday v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barbier v. BarryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Greenbelt Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Purdin v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Strickland Transportation Co. v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Strand v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API