Legal Opinion

United States v. Lamson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided September 28, 1909No. 2,631PublishedCited by 1 opinion

George F. Latnson was indicted for failure to make returns under the oleomargarine act. On motion to quash the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

The indictment charges the defendant,-a wholesale dealer in oleomargarine, with failure to make returns required by section 6 of the act of May 9, 1902 (Act May 9, 1902, c. 784, 32 Stat. 197 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 641]), known as the “Oleomargarine Act,” and by regulations made under said act. Section 6 provides:

“That wholesale dealers in oleomargarine, process, renovated or adulterated butter shall keep such books and render such returns in relation thereto as the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, may, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. LamsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Turner Bros.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API