Legal Opinion
EMC Corp. v. Pure Storage, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 13-1985-RGAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
Presently before the Court is Defendant Pure Storage, Inc.’s challenge to Plaintiff EMC Corporation’s standing to assert U.S. Patent Nos. 7,373,464 and 7,434,015 (“the deduplication patents”). (D.I. 372 at 9; D.I. 372-1 at 49-55). The matter has been fully briefed. (D.I.390, 403, 410). The parties agree that the record before the Court contains everything necessary to decide the standing issue without a hearing. (D.I. 390 at 18; D.I. 403 at 15 n.6). For the reasons stated below, the Court holds that EMC Corporation has standing to sue…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Prima Tek II, L.L.C. v. A-Roo Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Sicom Systems Ltd. v. Agilent Technologies, Inc., and Tektronix, Inc., and Lecroy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- San Rocco Therapeutics, LLC v. Bluebird Bio, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Waters Corporation v. Agilent Technologies Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019